The release of NITI Aayog’s eleven study reports on Scenarios towards Viksit Bharat and Net Zero marks the first time the Government of India has attempted a fully integrated, economy-wide modelling of how the country can reconcile rapid development with its long-term climate commitments. 

Far from being a technical exercise, the findings have deep implications for India’s growth model, fiscal strategy, energy security, and global positioning—particularly as the country approaches its centenary year of independence.

At the core of the exercise is a strategic proposition: Viksit Bharat by 2047 is achievable across all assessed scenarios, even while India progresses towards its Net Zero target by 2070. This framing deliberately pushes back against the notion that climate ambition necessarily constrains development for emerging economies. Instead, the reports position climate action as a structural feature of India’s future growth, not a trade-off.

Coal, Growth, and the Reality of Transition

One of the most consequential—and politically sensitive—findings is the explicit acknowledgment that India’s coal consumption will continue to rise until 2047, even under Net Zero–aligned pathways. This challenges simplistic narratives of an immediate fossil fuel phase-out and reinforces India’s stance on Common but Differentiated Responsibilities.

The implication is twofold. Domestically, it provides policy space to prioritize energy security and affordability during a period of rapid industrialization and urbanization. Internationally, it signals that India’s Net Zero pathway will differ fundamentally from that of advanced economies—relying on efficiency gains, electrification, and technology substitution rather than early absolute reductions in fossil fuel use.

Crucially, the modelling shows that rising coal use does not preclude Net Zero, provided energy intensity declines, efficiency improves, and clean electricity expands rapidly. This reframes the climate debate from fuel choices alone to system-wide outcomes.

Electrification as the Central Economic Lever

Across scenarios, electrification of energy demand emerges as the single most important driver of emissions reduction. Power, transport, industry, and buildings are all expected to shift decisively towards electricity, with clean generation underpinning the transition.

This has significant macroeconomic implications. Electrification creates demand for domestic manufacturing of renewables, batteries, electric vehicles, and grid infrastructure, strengthening India’s industrial base. At the same time, it raises the stakes for power-sector reforms, grid resilience, and storage deployment—areas where institutional and regulatory bottlenecks could become binding constraints.

The emphasis on Mission LiFE, behavioral change, and circularity further indicates that India’s transition strategy is not purely technology-driven. Demand moderation and resource efficiency are treated as economic necessities, not lifestyle add-ons, especially in a country where consumption growth will be rapid.

The $22 Trillion Question: Financing the Transition

Perhaps the most sobering implication of the reports lies in the financing numbers. The Net Zero pathway requires cumulative investment of roughly $22–23 trillion by 2070, with a projected financing gap of at least $6–6.5 trillion. This scale of capital mobilization is unprecedented in India’s development history.

The analysis makes clear that domestic savings and public finance alone will be insufficient. External capital—cheaper, longer-tenor, and patient—will be indispensable, elevating climate finance from a technical issue to a core diplomatic and macroeconomic priority.

This strengthens India’s negotiating position in global climate forums while simultaneously exposing vulnerabilities. Without reforms to deepen domestic capital markets, improve project bankability, and de-risk clean investments, India risks facing higher transition costs or slower deployment—both of which could undermine competitiveness as carbon-related trade barriers expand globally.

Leapfrogging and the Opportunity of Late Development

A striking insight from the study is that nearly 85% of India’s 2047 infrastructure is yet to be built. This transforms what is often seen as a development lag into a strategic advantage. India can, in principle, bypass carbon-intensive lock-ins that now burden advanced economies.

If realized, this could allow India to leapfrog into global leadership in clean technologies, from green hydrogen and advanced batteries to low-carbon industrial processes. The implication here is geopolitical as much as economic: technological leadership would enhance India’s influence across the Global South, where many countries face similar development–climate dilemmas.

A Template for the Global South

NITI Aayog explicitly frames India’s development pathway as a potential role model for other emerging economies. This is not merely rhetorical. By demonstrating that high growth, poverty reduction, and climate alignment can coexist—albeit on differentiated timelines—India positions itself as a bridge between climate ambition and development realism.

However, the reports also underline that success is conditional. The transition demands policy coherence, institutional capacity, regulatory reform, and sustained political commitment over multiple decades. The scenarios are technologically feasible, but not automatic.

From Vision to Execution

Ultimately, the significance of NITI Aayog’s exercise lies less in precise numbers than in its strategic signal. It reframes Net Zero as a developmental transformation rather than an environmental constraint, while candidly acknowledging the scale of investment, coordination, and international cooperation required.

For policymakers, the reports serve as a long-term planning anchor. For markets, they provide early visibility into the direction of India’s economy. And for the global climate discourse, they reinforce a central message: India’s path to Net Zero will be shaped by development priorities—but its choices will shape the world’s climate future.

Related posts:

NITI Aayog’s Roadmap Aims to Formalize India’s 490 Million Informal Workers—but Faces Steep Structural Hurdles From Compliance to Coercion: Why India’s Tax System Still Criminalizes Errors SEforALL Reports Highlight Urgent Need for Climate Finance and Resilient Energy in South Asia’s Healthcare Systems India Hosts High-Level Side Event at United Nations to Advance 2030 Sustainable Development Goals