When Jimmy Lai walked into Hong Kong’s High Court on Monday morning, smiling faintly and waving to family members, the moment carried the weight of more than a single verdict. It marked the end of an era — not just for a 78-year-old media tycoon facing life imprisonment, but for the idea that Hong Kong could remain politically distinct from the mainland China it returned to in 1997.

Lai was convicted on all charges in the city’s most consequential national security trial yet: two counts of colluding with foreign forces under Beijing’s sweeping national security law, and one count of conspiracy to publish seditious materials under a colonial-era statute revived for modern use. The ruling caps a five-year legal and political pursuit that transformed Lai from a billionaire publisher into the most recognizable symbol of Beijing’s crackdown on dissent.

From Guangdong Refugee to Capitalist Icon

Jimmy Lai Chee-ying’s story begins far from the marble halls of Hong Kong’s courts. Born in 1947 in Guangdong province, southern China, Lai fled to Hong Kong as a 12-year-old stowaway during the chaos of Mao Zedong’s campaigns. He arrived with nothing — no money, no education, and no political power — and worked as a child laborer in garment factories.

That escape from Communist China would shape the rest of his life.

Lai rose through sheer grit, founding the clothing brand Giordano in the 1980s and later reinventing himself as a media entrepreneur. In 1995, just two years before Hong Kong’s handover to China, he launched Apple Daily, a brash, populist tabloid that mixed celebrity gossip with aggressive political commentary. It was unapologetically anti-Communist, fiercely pro-democracy, and unlike anything Hong Kong had seen.

While many of the city’s tycoons hedged their bets and cultivated Beijing, Lai did the opposite. He publicly criticized the Chinese Communist Party, funded pro-democracy causes, and made enemies at the highest levels in Beijing long before it was dangerous to do so.

The Man Who Refused to Lie Low

After the 1997 handover, Lai became increasingly isolated among Hong Kong’s business elite. But he remained untouchable — or so it seemed — protected by the city’s courts, free press, and the promise that Hong Kong’s way of life would remain unchanged for 50 years.

That illusion shattered in 2019.

As millions poured into the streets to protest an extradition bill that critics feared would allow Beijing to seize dissidents, Apple Daily became the movement’s loudest megaphone. Lai openly backed the protests, met foreign officials, and gave frequent interviews to Western media. His image — thin, bespectacled, defiant — became inseparable from the uprising itself.

When Beijing imposed the national security law on June 30, 2020, Lai knew the net was tightening. But instead of fleeing — as many activists did — he stayed.

Friends later said Lai believed his international profile, British citizenship, and advanced age offered some protection. He continued writing columns, speaking to overseas audiences, and communicating with foreign politicians — albeit more cautiously.

It wasn’t enough.

Surveillance, Digital Trails, and the Slow Net

Lai was arrested in August 2020 in a dramatic police raid on Apple Daily’s newsroom. But his national security trial, which began in December 2023 and stretched over 156 days, revealed how comprehensively authorities had tracked him long before the handcuffs came out.

Judges cited encrypted messages, WhatsApp chats, live-streamed discussions, television interviews, and social media posts. His meetings with senior U.S. officials — including then–Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and congressional leaders — were reconstructed in forensic detail.

The court ruled that Lai’s lobbying of Washington for sanctions and international pressure amounted to an attempt to “bring down” the Chinese government. Judge Esther Toh likened it to an American seeking Russian help to undermine the United States — a comparison that underscored how Beijing now views political dissent: not as speech, but as subversion.

What once passed as activism was retroactively reclassified as conspiracy.

Apple Daily and the Criminalization of Journalism

Central to the case was Apple Daily itself. Prosecutors argued that Lai used the paper to incite hatred against both the Hong Kong and Chinese governments, publishing articles that encouraged resistance and undermined state authority.

In 2021, the paper was forced to shut down after its assets were frozen and senior editors arrested. Its closure sent shockwaves through Hong Kong’s media industry — a warning that editorial lines, not just actions, could be criminal offenses.

Lai denied manipulating coverage or directing journalists to publish seditious content. But the court found that ownership itself implied responsibility, effectively collapsing the distinction between publisher, editor, and political actor.

A Trial the World Was Watching

Western governments condemned the proceedings as politically motivated. The United States and Britain repeatedly called for Lai’s release, and President Donald Trump has publicly vowed to “free” him.

Trump even discussed Lai’s case directly with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a meeting in October, underscoring the diplomatic stakes.

Human rights groups were harsher. Human Rights Watch called the verdict “cruel and a travesty of justice,” while the Committee to Protect Journalists warned that Lai’s declining health — he suffers from diabetes, hypertension, and heart palpitations — could make the sentence a death warrant.

Beijing and Hong Kong authorities dismissed the criticism, insisting Lai received a fair trial and that press freedom remains protected — so long as it does not threaten national security.

Why This Verdict Matters

Lai’s conviction is not the first under Hong Kong’s national security regime, but it is the most symbolic. Others — including journalists from Stand News and 47 pro-democracy figures charged over an unofficial primary election — have already been convicted. But Lai embodied defiance in a way few others did: wealthy, globally connected, and unwilling to apologize.

His fall coincides with the systematic dismantling of Hong Kong’s opposition infrastructure. The city’s last major opposition party disbanded just a day before the verdict. Legislative elections now require national security vetting, producing record-low turnout and a legislature devoid of meaningful opposition.

Hong Kong has not merely been pacified; it has been re-engineered.

The End of the Line

Jimmy Lai has spent nearly five years in solitary confinement. He now faces the possibility of life imprisonment — a sentence that would almost certainly mean he dies behind bars.

Yet even in defeat, Lai’s case leaves a legacy. It clarifies, unmistakably, where the red lines now lie. Engagement with foreign governments, critical journalism, and even retrospective interpretation of speech are all subject to criminal sanction.

For Hong Kong, the message is blunt: dissent is no longer tolerated, only remembered.

And for Jimmy Lai — the refugee who escaped Communist China only to be reclaimed by it decades later — history may record him not just as a convicted dissident, but as the man whose trial confirmed that the Hong Kong he believed in is gone for good.

Disclaimer: The opinions and views expressed in this article/column are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or positions of South Asian Herald.

Related posts:

Apple’s Strategic Response: How Tim Cook Is Preparing for the AI Era Hong Kong Sixes Returns: 12 International Teams Set to Compete in World’s Shortest Cricket Format Congressman Krishnamoorthi Presented with Champion of Freedom Award at ‘Toast to Freedom’ Event An Unexpected Détente: Trump and Mamdani’s White House Rapprochement